| 1 Varieties and percentage seeded acreage from the Feb 5, 2007 Wheat Variety survey, Kansas Ag. Statistics, Topeka, KS. |
2 Most ratings are estimates based on information and observations from many sources over several years.
Agronomic information by Joe Martin - Hays, and Allen Fritz, Jim Shroyer, and Kraig Roozeboom - K-State Agronomy. |
| 3 Summary of crop performance test results from recent years. |
4 Ratings from Rebecca Miller - K-State Wheat Quality Laboratory, using inputs from the
U.S. Grain Marketing and Production Research Center, and industry.
EX = Exceptional; large kernels; high protein content; very good milling, mixing, and commercial bread-baking.
AC = Acceptable; milling and baking attributes acceptable, but not outstanding, for all properties; may have minor defects.
LD = Less Desirable; one or more serious quality defects.
-- = Inadequate information or conflicting data
*Strong blending wheat; needed for blending with weaker wheats, may not be suitable alone for bread flour. |
| |
|
Relative |
| Variety1 |
% KS
seeded
acreage
2007 1 |
|
Test
weight2 |
Straw
stgth |
Matu-
rity |
Ht3 |
Cole-
optile
length |
Shat-
tering |
Winter
hardi-
ness |
Al
Toler-
ance |
Sprout
Toler-
ance |
Protein
con-
tent3 |
Milling
and
baking
quality4 |
| |
Scale: |
|
1=Best |
1=Best |
1=Early |
1=Short |
1=Long |
1=Best |
1=Best |
1=Best |
1=Best |
1=Best |
|
| |
|
|
9=Poor |
9=Poor |
9=Late |
9=Tall |
9=Short |
9=Poor |
9=Poor |
9=Poor |
9=Poor |
9=Poor |
|
| Overley |
23.3 |
|
3 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
EX |
| Jagalene |
23.1 |
|
3 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
EX |
| Jagger |
17.1 |
|
4 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
EX* |
| TAM 111 |
4.0 |
|
3 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
-- |
2 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
AC |
| 2137 |
2.9 |
|
4 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
AC |
| Cutter |
2.1 |
|
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
-- |
3 |
4 |
AC |
| T81 |
2.0 |
|
4 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
8 |
AC |
| TAM 110 |
1.5 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
-- |
8 |
3 |
7 |
AC |
| Santa Fe |
1.3 |
|
3 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
5 |
AC |
| Ike |
1.2 |
|
3 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
2 |
3 |
AC |
| 2174 |
1.1 |
|
3 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
AC |
| Karl/Karl 92 |
1.0 |
|
3 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
9 |
3 |
3 |
EX* |
| Danby+ |
0.7 |
|
3 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
4 |
-- |
AC |
| 2145 |
0.5 |
|
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
8 |
3 |
3 |
AC |
| Trego+ |
0.5 |
|
3 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
5 |
7 |
AC |
| Variety1 |
% KS
seeded
acreage
2007 1 |
|
Test
weight2 |
Straw
stgth |
Matu-
rity |
Ht3 |
Cole-
optile
length |
Shat-
tering |
Winter
hardi-
ness |
Al
Toler-
ance |
Sprout
Toler-
ance |
Protein
con-
tent3 |
Milling
and
baking
quality4 |
| TAM 112 |
0.4 |
|
-- |
4 |
2 |
5 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
AC |
| Dominator |
0.4 |
|
4 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
8 |
7 |
3 |
8 |
5 |
3 |
AC |
| Wesley |
0.4 |
|
4 |
-- |
5 |
4 |
-- |
2 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
4 |
AC |
| Thunderbolt |
0.4 |
|
2 |
-- |
3 |
7 |
6 |
6 |
-- |
7 |
2 |
3 |
AC |
| Protection |
0.3 |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
7 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| Larned |
0.3 |
|
4 |
5 |
4 |
9 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
8 |
3 |
4 |
AC |
| Coronado |
0.2 |
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
-- |
3 |
AC |
| 2163 |
0.2 |
|
6 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
-- |
7 |
LD |
| NuHills+ |
0.2 |
|
3 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
3 |
AC |
| Onaga |
0.2 |
|
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
3 |
-- |
| T83 |
0.2 |
|
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
| NuFrontier+ |
0.2 |
|
4 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
-- |
-- |
7 |
5 |
AC |
| Stanton |
0.2 |
|
4 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
-- |
2 |
4 |
AC |
| Blends |
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Other White |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Other Red |
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Other Soft |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Scale: |
|
1=Best |
1=Best |
1=Early |
1=Short |
1=Long |
1=Best |
1=Best |
1=Best |
1=Best |
1=Best |
|
| |
|
|
9=Poor |
9=Poor |
9=Late |
9=Tall |
9=Short |
9=Poor |
9=Poor |
9=Poor |
9=Poor |
9=Poor |
|
| 1
Varieties and percentage seeded acreage from the Feb 5, 2007 Wheat Variety survey, Kansas Ag. Statistics,
Topeka, KS. |
2
Most ratings are estimates based on information
and observations from many sources over several
years.
Agronomic information
by Joe Martin - Hays, and Allen Fritz, Jim
Shroyer, and Kraig Roozeboom -
K-State Agronomy. |
| 3
Summary of crop performance test results
from recent years. |
4
Ratings from Rebecca Miller - K-State Wheat Quality Laboratory, using inputs from the
U.S. Grain Marketing and Production Research
Center, and industry.
EX = Exceptional; large kernels; high protein
content; very good milling,
mixing, and commercial bread-baking.
AC = Acceptable;
milling and baking attributes acceptable,
but not
outstanding, for all properties; may have
minor defects.
LD = Less Desirable; one or more serious
quality defects.
-- = Inadequate information or conflicting
data
*Strong
blending wheat; needed for blending with
weaker wheats,
may not be suitable alone for bread flour. |
Links for each Location or Region
